Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of selective breeding versus genetic modification. Why might a person choose to use selective breeding over genetic modification? Why might a person choose to create a GMO over a selectively bred organism? Use three to five sentences to formulate your argument.(4 points)
hello
Selective breeding involves the deliberate selection of desired traits over many generations, with the advantage of preserving genetic diversity within a species. It is less controversial and allows for natural changes to occur. On the other hand, genetic modification involves directly altering an organism's DNA, resulting in faster and more precise modifications, but potentially leading to unintended consequences and reduced genetic diversity.
A person might prefer selective breeding over genetic modification because it is a more natural method that aligns with traditional agricultural practices, and it allows for the preservation of natural genetic diversity within a species. By using selective breeding, they can also avoid potential ethical and environmental concerns associated with genetic engineering.
On the other hand, creating a genetically modified organism (GMO) might be preferred in certain situations. It allows for specific traits to be introduced into an organism that may not be possible through selective breeding. Genetic modification can also be a faster process compared to selective breeding, enabling the production of desired traits within a shorter timeframe. Additionally, GMOs can be designed to resist pests, diseases, or withstand harsh environmental conditions, offering potential advantages in terms of crop yields and sustainability.