How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling? (1 point) It extended a military campaign It nullified all It was a against Native American peoples who had farm land. previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees. law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state. It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 went against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling because it ignored the fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States. The Worcester v. Georgia ruling, which was a Supreme Court case in 1832, recognized the Cherokee Nation as a sovereign entity and affirmed their right to self-government and to remain on their ancestral lands. However, the Indian Removal Act authorized the forcible removal of Native American tribes, including the Cherokees, from their lands in the southeastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River, contradicting the Worcester v. Georgia ruling.
