which state best explain how the conflict over tariff of 1828 was resolved
The conflict over the Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations, was primarily resolved through a series of political compromises. The state that best explains how this conflict was resolved is South Carolina.
South Carolina was one of the states most affected by the tariff as it heavily relied on imported goods and perceived the tariff as benefiting manufacturing states in the North at the expense of Southern agricultural interests. As a result, South Carolina took the lead in opposing the tariff and threatening to nullify it within its borders.
In response to South Carolina's opposition, President Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation in 1832 reaffirming the federal government's authority to enforce the tariff laws. However, recognizing the potentially escalating conflict, Congress introduced a compromise tariff bill in 1833.
This compromise tariff, known as the Tariff of 1833 or the Compromise Tariff, was designed to gradually reduce the rates of the Tariff of 1828 over a period of ten years, satisfying both Southern and Northern interests to some extent. The compromise was proposed by Henry Clay and supported by John C. Calhoun, a South Carolina senator who had initially opposed the tariff.
South Carolina, led by Calhoun, accepted the compromise tariff and rescinded its ordinance of nullification. This resolution helped to defuse the tension and prevent a potential armed conflict between the state and the federal government.
The Compromise Tariff of 1833 is often seen as a significant moment in the history of American political compromise, as it successfully resolved a major dispute and avoided a potential crisis over states' rights and federal authority. Hence, South Carolina's role in accepting the compromise tariff and ending the conflict over the Tariff of 1828 is crucial in understanding how the resolution was achieved.