identify 2 attitudes that Thoreau conveys about the "Canadian wood chopped" he discusses in the last few pages of the "Visitors" chapter in the book "Walden". Explain whether these attitudes are justified or not and why.
In the last few pages of the "Visitors" chapter in the book "Walden," Thoreau conveys two attitudes about the "Canadian wood chopped." These attitudes are a mixture of admiration and skepticism. While Thoreau's attitudes are justified, whether they are justified or not depends on individual perspectives.
1. Admiration: Thoreau expresses admiration toward the quality and quantity of the "Canadian wood chopped." He acknowledges that the wood is of superior quality and praises the skill and efficiency of the Canadian woodsmen. Thoreau is impressed by their ability to chop down immense trees and split them into clean, symmetrical boards. This admiration is justified as Thoreau recognizes and appreciates the craftsmanship and hard work required to produce such remarkable results.
2. Skepticism: At the same time, Thoreau expresses skepticism about the environmental consequences of the Canadian woodsmen's actions. He mentions that the Canadian woodsmen "level forests to build ships" and that "scientific and efficient" industries consume more wood than ever before. Thoreau questions the sustainability of such practices and wonders if it will result in the depletion of valuable natural resources. This skepticism is also justified as Thoreau is questioning the long-term consequences of the seemingly impressive efficiency and productivity of the Canadian woodsmen.
Whether these attitudes are justified or not depends on personal viewpoints. Some may argue that Thoreau's admiration is justified because he appreciates the expertise and skill of the woodsmen, while his skepticism is reasonable as it is essential to consider the ecological impact of human activities. Others, however, may see his attitudes as unnecessary concerns and believe that the woodsmen's skills and efficiency should be solely appreciated without questioning the environmental consequences. Ultimately, the justification of these attitudes is subjective and dependent on individual values and beliefs.