according to Dred Scott’s lawsuit, how had his rights been related?

“ in the text, you read this about the dread Scott case: George Scott had been enslaved for many years in Missouri. Later he moved with his owner, who has an Ari surgeon, to Illinois, and then to the Wisconsin territory, where slavery was not allowed. After they returned to Missouri, Scott’s owner died. The owners wife took ownership of Scott, and eventually those rights transferred to her brother, John Sandford. anti-slavery lawyers helped Scott to file a lawsuit, a legal case brought to settle a dispute between people or groups. Scott’s lawyers argued that, because Scott had lived in a free territory, he had become a freeman.”

a. He had been forced to move against his will to different places.
b. He was kept as a slave, even though he lived in free territory.
c. His ownership had been transferred without his agreement.
d. He was not allowed to talk to a lawyer to prepare for his case.

The correct answer is b. He was kept as a slave, even though he lived in free territory.