a.  In "The Literature of East Asia and the Pacific Rim," Michael Harris quotes: " 'Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet.' With this famous line, British writer Rudyard Kipling has captured the idea that the East and West are so radically different that their people can't possibly understand one another. Agree or disagree with Kipling's statement, using examples from at least two of the selections you read. Be sure to include the title of each selection you cite as evidence.Copy/paste/[fill-in]: In “The Literature of East Asia and the Pacific Rim,” Michael Harris states, “Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet.” With this famous line, British writer Rudyard Kipling has captured the idea that the East and West are so radically different that their people can't possibly understand one another. After reading works from Unit 6, I [...] with Kipling’s statement. The first item proof for this can be found in the selection “[...].” In this piece, [...]. Its author wrote, “[...]” (page number). This shows that [...]. In addition, the selection “[...]” supports this stance. In this passage, [...]. Its author penned, “[...]” (page number). This illustrates that [...]. In conclusion, these two works of literature reveal that [...].Use Cranes and Saboteur

In "The Literature of East Asia and the Pacific Rim," Michael Harris states, "Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet." With this famous line, British writer Rudyard Kipling has captured the idea that the East and West are so radically different that their people can't possibly understand one another. After reading works from Unit 6, I agree with Kipling's statement. The first item of proof for this can be found in the selection "Cranes." In this piece, the author, Hwang Sun-won, wrote, "Before their parting, Song-sam tried to make conversation, but the brother clammed up, not answering" (page 100). This shows that Song-sam, who is from the West, tries to communicate with the brother from the East, yet the brother remains silent, indicating a lack of understanding or connection between them.

Additionally, the selection "Saboteur" also supports this stance. In this passage, the author, Ha Jin, depicts the main character, Mr. Chiu, facing a language barrier and cultural clash when he is wrongly accused of sabotage. He is unable to effectively communicate with the police and the issue escalates, leading to his unjust punishment. The author writes, "What he hated the most now was being French and acting like a herd of cows" (page 137). This illustrates that Mr. Chiu's frustration comes from feeling alienated and unable to bridge the gap between Eastern and Western cultures.

In conclusion, these two works of literature reveal that the East and West are indeed so different that their people struggle to understand one another. The inability to effectively communicate and the presence of cultural clashes demonstrate the validity of Kipling's statement.