What do you think a concern for New Mexicans might have been when Article X was stricken out?(5 points)
1) Economic impact: Article X, which was focused on land and natural resources, may have raised concerns about the potential negative effects on New Mexico's economy. With the removal of this article, there may have been worries about the loss of control over land and resources that could have impacted industries such as agriculture, mining, and tourism.
2) Environmental concerns: Article X may have contained provisions related to the protection and preservation of New Mexico's natural environment. The removal of this article may have caused concerns among New Mexicans who prioritize environmental conservation and sustainability.
3) Indigenous rights: New Mexico has a significant Native American population, and Article X might have contained provisions related to their land rights and self-governance. The removal of this article might have raised concerns about the potential infringement of indigenous rights and their ability to control their ancestral lands.
4) Government accountability: Article X could have included provisions for public involvement, transparency, and accountability in land and natural resource management. The stricken-out of this article might have left New Mexicans worried about the lack of mechanisms to hold the government accountable for decisions related to land and resources.
5) Cultural heritage preservation: New Mexico is rich in cultural heritage, including traditional practices, historic sites, and sacred lands. Article X might have addressed the protection of cultural heritage in relation to land and resources. Its removal might have raised concerns about the potential loss or degradation of cultural heritage due to unchecked development or exploitation.