Which statement best analyzes a key difference between European expansion in the Western and Eastern Hemispheres? (point) Europeans did not set up any colonies in the Eastern Hemisphere, but Europeans did set up colonies in the Western Hemisphere The Roman Church told European nations they could explore the Eastern Hemisphere but only parts of the Western Hemisphere the Eastern Hemisphere Europeans focused on conquering as many local people as they couldwhile in the Western Hemisphere Europeans peacefully traded with local people the Eastern Europeans were able to set up trade with different peoples, in the Western HemisphereEuropeans focused on conquering different peoples
The correct statement that best analyzes a key difference between European expansion in the Western and Eastern Hemispheres is: Europeans did not set up any colonies in the Eastern Hemisphere, but Europeans did set up colonies in the Western Hemisphere.
Are you sure
I apologize for the confusion. Upon reviewing the options, the statement "The Eastern Europeans were able to set up trade with different peoples, in the Western Hemisphere Europeans focused on conquering different peoples" best analyzes a key difference between European expansion in the Western and Eastern Hemispheres. Please disregard my previous response.
