Why do you think the author left out certain stories? in the columbian exchange
There could be several reasons why the author may have chosen to leave out certain stories in their discussion of the Columbian Exchange. Here are a few possibilities:
1. Focus and Scope: The author may have wanted to keep the analysis focused on particular aspects or themes of the Columbian Exchange. Including every story and detail would have made the book or article lengthy and less cohesive. Therefore, the author may have selected only those stories that were most relevant to their argument or aligned with the specific focus of their work.
2. Available Information: The author's decision to omit certain stories could be due to limited sources or incomplete historical records. Sometimes, historical events and exchanges may not be well-documented or difficult to access, making it challenging for the author to include them in their analysis. If the author relied on specific sources, they may have omitted stories that weren't supported by those sources.
3. Narrative Flow: The author may have excluded certain stories for the sake of maintaining a smooth narrative flow and coherence. When discussing a complex topic like the Columbian Exchange, authors often need to prioritize and structure information in a way that makes it more accessible to readers. Including all stories, regardless of their relevance or impact, could disrupt the overall flow of the narrative and confuse readers.
4. Editorial Considerations: Editors and publishers may have had input into the content and length of the author's work. They might have advised the author to exclude certain stories to meet specific word limits, fit a certain format, or adhere to marketing strategies.
It's important to note that the reasons for excluding certain stories can vary from author to author, and it is ultimately the author's choice what to include or omit in their work.