explain the diffrent veiwpoints of rederick douglass and captain cannot regardiing slavery what evidence does each use? how does each present his information
Frederick Douglass and Captain Cannot (assuming this is a fictional character representing pro-slavery views) hold contrasting viewpoints regarding slavery. While Douglass was a prominent abolitionist, Captain Cannot represents the pro-slavery perspective.
Frederick Douglass presents his viewpoint against slavery with evidence primarily drawn from his own personal experiences as a former slave. He recounts the brutal realities and cruelties of slavery, emphasizing the inhuman treatment, physical abuse, and psychological torment suffered by enslaved individuals. He also highlights the broken family structures and lack of educational opportunities endured by slaves. Douglass further supports his argument by appealing to the basic principles of equality and human rights, contending that all individuals should have the right to freedom and self-determination.
On the other hand, Captain Cannot likely presents his pro-slavery viewpoint by attempting to justify and defend the institution of slavery. His evidence may include arguments based on economic necessity, asserting that the institution of slavery was crucial for sustaining the agricultural economies of the Southern states. He might argue that without slave labor, plantations would not be productive or profitable. Additionally, Captain Cannot might present racist ideas, suggesting that Africans were inherently inferior and better off under the paternalistic care of slaveowners.
While Douglass utilizes personal narratives, emotions, and moral reasoning to present his information, Captain Cannot probably relies on economic justifications, pseudoscience, and racist ideology to bolster his arguments. It is important to note that Captain Cannot, being fictional, does not necessarily represent real historical pro-slavery figures, but rather embodies the broad perspective of people who supported slavery in the 19th century.