Which statement best analyzes a key difference between European expansion in the Western and Eastern Hemispheres?(1 point) Responses In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering as many local people as they could, while in the Western Hemisphere Europeans peacefully traded with local people. In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering as many local people as they could, while in the Western Hemisphere Europeans peacefully traded with local people. Europeans did not set up any colonies in the Eastern Hemisphere, but Europeans did set up colonies in the Western Hemisphere. Europeans did not set up any colonies in the Eastern Hemisphere, but Europeans did set up colonies in the Western Hemisphere. In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans were able to set up trade relationships with different peoples, but in the Western Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering different peoples. In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans were able to set up trade relationships with different peoples, but in the Western Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering different peoples. The Roman Catholic Church told European nations they could explore the Eastern Hemisphere but only parts of the Western Hemisphere..

The statement that best analyzes a key difference between European expansion in the Western and Eastern Hemispheres is: In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering as many local people as they could, while in the Western Hemisphere Europeans peacefully traded with local people.

double check

Apologies for the confusion. Let's go through each statement to determine the correct answer:

1) In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering as many local people as they could, while in the Western Hemisphere Europeans peacefully traded with local people.
This statement incorrectly suggests that Europeans peacefully traded with local people in the Western Hemisphere, which is not entirely accurate. European colonization in the Western Hemisphere often involved both conquest and trading with local peoples.

2) Europeans did not set up any colonies in the Eastern Hemisphere, but Europeans did set up colonies in the Western Hemisphere.
This statement is incorrect. Europeans did establish colonies in both the Eastern and Western Hemispheres, such as European powers expanding their territories in Africa and Asia.

3) In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans were able to set up trade relationships with different peoples, but in the Western Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering different peoples.
This statement correctly highlights the focus on trade relationships in the Eastern Hemisphere and a greater emphasis on conquest in the Western Hemisphere. Therefore, it is the most accurate statement in terms of analyzing the key difference between European expansion in the two hemispheres.

4) The Roman Catholic Church told European nations they could explore the Eastern Hemisphere but only parts of the Western Hemisphere.
This statement does not accurately capture the key difference between European expansion in the two hemispheres but rather mentions a specific directive given by the Roman Catholic Church to explore certain parts of the Western Hemisphere.

Therefore, the statement that best analyzes a key difference between European expansion in the Western and Eastern Hemispheres is: In the Eastern Hemisphere, Europeans were able to set up trade relationships with different peoples, but in the Western Hemisphere, Europeans focused on conquering different peoples.