Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

How did the public opinion poll linkage institution unintentionally impact the 2016 election cycle?(1 point)

Responses

Shy voters, educational levels, and the observer effect led the public to believe Clinton would win the election.
Shy voters, educational levels, and the observer effect led the public to believe Clinton would win the election.

The observer effect led the public to believe Trump would win the election.
The observer effect led the public to believe Trump would win the election.

Fake news, educational levels, and the observer effects led the public to believe Clinton would win the election.
Fake news, educational levels, and the observer effects led the public to believe Clinton would win the election.

The observer effect led the public to believe Clinton would win the election.
The observer effect led the public to believe Clinton would win the election.

It is unclear whether any specific option is correct as the question asks for unintentional impacts of public opinion poll linkage institutions on the 2016 election cycle. None of the provided options directly address this aspect. The options mostly focus on the observer effect, educational levels, and the belief that Clinton would win the election, but they do not clearly illustrate how public opinion polls unintentionally impacted the election.

a,b,c, or d

If I have to select from the given options, then option A seems to be the most appropriate. Shy voters, educational levels, and the observer effect led the public to believe Clinton would win the election. However, it is still important to note that this option does not directly address the unintentional impact of public opinion poll linkage institutions.