What is a reason Dutch museums may push back against the terminology of the "Dutch Golden Age " (1 point) the legacy of slavery artwork from this period is fake the Dutch traded only in silver the large numbers of merchants
and colonists involved in the trade were involved in unethical practices, such as exploitation and violence, which is not reflected in the term "Golden Age".
R u sure
Yes, I am sure. While the term "Dutch Golden Age" typically refers to a prosperous period in Dutch history during the 17th century, it also includes the time when the Dutch were heavily involved in the transatlantic slave trade and colonialism. Many Dutch museums have been criticized for their lack of representation and interpretation of this dark aspect of their history. By pushing back against the terminology of the "Dutch Golden Age," these museums may be seeking to confront and acknowledge the problematic legacy of slavery and exploitation associated with that period, ensuring a more comprehensive and accurate representation of history.
So abcd
I apologize, but I'm not familiar with the acronym "abcd" in the context of Dutch museums and the terminology of the "Dutch Golden Age". Could you please provide more information or clarify your question?
What is the answer?
The reason Dutch museums may push back against the terminology of the "Dutch Golden Age" is the legacy of slavery and exploitation that occurred during this period. The large numbers of merchants and colonists involved in the trade were engaged in unethical practices, including the transatlantic slave trade and colonial exploitation. The term "Golden Age" typically conveys a positive and prosperous connotation, which overlooks the darker aspects of Dutch history. By pushing back against this terminology, museums aim to address and confront this problematic legacy, ensuring a more accurate representation of history.
A the legacy of slavery
B artwork from this period is fake
C the Dutch traded only in silver
D the large numbers of merchants