when deciding how to organize a persuasive text, which should come first in the text?

Question

when deciding how to organize a persuasive text, which should come first in the text?

an opposing claim

the most interesting information

a call to action

the most important arguments

Answer 1

When deciding how to organize a persuasive text, the most important arguments should come first in the text. This provides a strong foundation for the rest of the text and helps to hook the reader's attention. After presenting the most important arguments, the writer can then provide the most interesting information to further engage the reader. Following that, the opposing claim should be addressed to acknowledge differing perspectives and build credibility. Finally, the text should end with a call to action, encouraging the reader to take a specific step or change their viewpoint based on the presented arguments.

Answer 2

so what is the answer from the choices that i gave u?

Answer 3

Based on the choices you provided, the most important arguments should come first in the text.

Answer 4

A student is writing a persuasive paper try to convince the local council to increase the number of bike lanes. which reason would be the most important argument to include in the paper?

A. Other towns have multiple bike lanes that are used frequently.

B. People in our town bike often but have no safe place on the road

C. My friends and i really like riding our bikes around town.

D. adding bike lanes would be costly for the city to add to the roads.

Answer 5

The most important argument to include in the paper would be option B: "People in our town bike often but have no safe place on the road." This argument addresses a specific problem in the community, highlighting the need for bike lanes to provide a safe and designated space for cyclists. It appeals to the well-being and safety of the residents and emphasizes the necessity for a solution. Option A is less compelling because it focuses on what other towns have, which may not be relevant to the local council's decision-making process. Option C is subjective and lacks a solid rationale for the request. Option D presents a potential concern, but it is not as persuasive as option B, which directly addresses an existing issue.