Analyze the impact of NAFTA on Mexican corn farmers. Why did so many Mexican corn farmers lose their livelihoods as a consequence of NAFTA? (1 point)
Manufacturing jobs that processed the corn left Mexico for the U.S. due to lower wages, reducing the need for Mexican-grown corn.
NAFTA gave subsidies to Mexican corn farmers to increase production, which flooded the market.
Mexican farmers could not compete with government- subsidized U.S. corn.
Changes in consumer food preferences from corn toward wheat reduced demand.
The correct answer is: Mexican farmers could not compete with government-subsidized U.S. corn.
One of the main reasons why many Mexican corn farmers lost their livelihoods as a consequence of NAFTA was the inability to compete with government-subsidized U.S. corn. Under NAFTA, the United States heavily subsidized its corn industry, which led to an increase in corn production and a surplus of cheap corn flooding the Mexican market. These subsidies allowed U.S. corn to be sold at much lower prices than Mexican corn, making it difficult for Mexican farmers to sell their produce and earn a decent income.
As a result, many Mexican corn farmers could not sustain their agricultural activities and were forced to abandon their farms or switch to other crops. The influx of cheaper U.S. corn also affected local corn prices, making it difficult for Mexican farmers to cover their production costs and remain competitive.
Moreover, the increased availability of cheaper corn from the U.S. led to changes in consumer food preferences in Mexico. As the price of corn decreased, consumers started shifting towards other grains like wheat, which further reduced the demand for Mexican corn. This shift in consumer preferences impacted the market for Mexican corn and resulted in a decrease in sales and profits for Mexican corn farmers.
In conclusion, the combination of government-subsidized U.S. corn flooding the market and changes in consumer food preferences led to a significant impact on Mexican corn farmers. They lost their livelihoods due to the inability to compete with cheaper U.S. corn and the subsequent decrease in demand for Mexican-grown corn.
How do quotas protect local producers? (1 point) Quotas help organize workers to advocate for increased
protections.
Quotas increase competition among different countries, which lowers prices of goods.
Quotas add a fee to the price of imported goods, so they are less competitive than local products.
Quotas limit the goods that can be imported, which ensures less competition for local producers.
The correct answer is: Quotas limit the goods that can be imported, which ensures less competition for local producers.
Quotas protect local producers by limiting the amount of goods that can be imported into a country. By setting a maximum limit on the quantity of a specific product that can be imported, quotas effectively reduce the level of competition faced by local producers.
When goods from other countries face restrictions on their importation, it creates a barrier to entry for foreign producers. This limited competition allows local producers to enjoy a higher market share and sell their products at potentially higher prices. By limiting the quantity of imported goods, quotas help support the domestic industry and protect it from being overrun by foreign competition.
While some may argue that quotas increase competition among different countries and lower prices, this is not the primary goal or impact of quotas. Instead, quotas are specifically designed to limit the amount of imports in order to protect local producers and industries.
Quotas do not add a fee to the price of imported goods to make them less competitive than local products; this is typically done through tariffs or other trade measures. Quotas solely focus on restricting the quantity of imports, while tariffs impose additional costs on imported goods to make them less attractive compared to domestically produced goods.
Which option best analyzes how exchange becomes more efficient at a national scale? (1 point)
Places within a country specialize based on comparative advantage, meanwhile better technologies enable exchange.
Countries enter into treaties that encourage trade, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Quaternary industries develop that benefit existing retail structures in local economies by connecting them to other places around the country.
Urban centers refocus on primary industries, leading to the development of secondary industries that encourage exchange.
The correct answer is: Places within a country specialize based on comparative advantage, meanwhile better technologies enable exchange.
The option that best analyzes how exchange becomes more efficient at a national scale is when places within a country specialize based on comparative advantage, meanwhile better technologies enable exchange.
Specializing based on comparative advantage refers to regions or cities focusing on producing goods or services that they can produce more efficiently or at lower costs compared to other regions. This specialization allows for increased efficiency as it enables regions to concentrate on what they do best, leading to higher productivity and output.
Better technologies play a crucial role in facilitating efficient exchange at a national scale. Technological advancements in transportation, communication, and logistics can significantly reduce costs, increase the speed of exchange, and improve the overall efficiency of trade. For example, improved transportation infrastructure, such as highways, railways, and ports, can facilitate the movement of goods and raw materials, enabling more efficient exchange across regions within a country.
The other options do not directly address how exchange becomes more efficient at a national scale. While treaties and trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement can promote and facilitate trade between countries, they do not specifically analyze national-scale efficiency. Quaternary industries and the development of secondary industries in urban centers can contribute to economic growth and exchange but do not explicitly focus on efficiency at a national level.
What type of industries are primarily involved in exchanges between rural mining towns and urban manufacturing centers that use their minerals? (1 point)
secondary and quaternary industries primary and tertiary industries primary and secondary industries secondary and tertiary industries
The correct answer is: primary and secondary industries.
The exchanges between rural mining towns and urban manufacturing centers primarily involve primary and secondary industries.
Primary industries refer to sectors involved in the extraction and production of raw materials or natural resources. In the case of rural mining towns, the primary industry would involve mining activities to extract minerals from the earth.
On the other hand, secondary industries involve the processing and manufacturing of these raw materials into finished goods. In the context of urban manufacturing centers, these industries use the minerals obtained from mining to produce various products, such as machinery, equipment, automobiles, appliances, or construction materials.
Therefore, the primary industry (mining) in rural areas supplies raw materials to the secondary industry (manufacturing) in urban areas, leading to exchanges and economic interactions between these two sectors.