Found this in a museum storage.are
Derenle Argren son of Denilo Argren and Princess Anila Voyal, you have been a signed to the task of being Princess Victra Voyal body guard. For hiss Majesty King Elmer 2nd of that name, says thus: "he may be a Prince but who else can I trust to protect my youngest daughter. I trust him most for he is my grandson and Victoria his aunt. """ His majesty also states thus: most of my knights lack something, yet there are many who don't lack something. But I need those knights, yet I find them slightly trust worthy to protect VictraVoyal, But when my mind falls on Derenle Argren it is given comfort. For I know him well, he will go as far as to protect her with his life" """""
Signed Elmer Voyal, Elmer the 2nd.
This appears to be a document assigning Derenle Argren the task of being Princess Victra Voyal's bodyguard. It is signed by King Elmer II, who states that he trusts Derenle the most to protect his youngest daughter because he is his grandson and Victoria, the princess' aunt. The king also mentions that while some knights may lack something, he finds Derenle trustworthy and believes he would go to great lengths, even risking his own life, to protect Princess Victra Voyal.
This document was likely found in a museum storage, suggesting it may be a historical artifact or piece of archival material. However, without further context or information, it is difficult to determine the exact significance or origin of this document.
What exactly do you mean by exact significance or origin of this document.
By "exact significance," I mean understanding the full historical, cultural, or political context in which this document was created. This would involve knowing the specific time period, region, and events surrounding its creation, as well as identifying the individuals mentioned and their roles within that context.
For the "origin" of the document, we would want to know who created it, why it was created, and for what purpose. This could provide insights into the authority or importance of the document, and its place within a broader historical narrative.
Without more information, it is challenging to determine these details and fully understand the significance and origin of the document you found in the museum storage.
I have infor on the origin
If you have additional information on the origin of the document, please provide it, and I will do my best to help you understand its significance.
The man who wrote this document was a knight and the kings royal scribe. His name was Nathine. He also wrote a journal and stated thus: I was partly scared when I wrote the document to Derenle for I feared the kings anger at the time. He passed back and forth telling me what to write, and yelled at me for making a couple errors. His majesty never acts that way he only did on this occasion due to only that morning two men tried to kidnap Victra the princess. He even yelled at his own son for interrupting him. He also yelled at the gate Lord (the man in charge of the archers at the palace and city gates) for letting such men in. I could hardly believe this for he has such good relationship with him. But he apologised to us all later on.
Thank you for providing additional information about the origin of the document and the context surrounding its creation. From this information, it seems that Nathine, a knight and the king's royal scribe, wrote the document assigning Derenle Argren as Princess Victra Voyal's bodyguard.
According to Nathine's journal, he was partially scared when writing the document because he feared the king's anger at the time. The king was apparently agitated due to a recent incident where two men attempted to kidnap Princess Victra. This event likely heightened the king's concern for his daughter's safety, leading to his more intense demeanor during the drafting of the document.
It is interesting to note that the king admonished Nathine for making a couple of errors while writing the document and also scolded his own son and the gate Lord responsible for allowing the kidnappers to enter the palace or city. This suggests that the king took the security of his daughter very seriously and held those responsible accountable.
Overall, this additional information sheds light on the circumstances surrounding the creation of the document and provides insights into the heightened sense of urgency and concern for Princess Victra's safety at that particular time.
Found this in a museum storage.are
Derenle Argren son of Denilo Argren and Princess Anila Voyal, you have been a signed to the task of being Princess Victra Voyal body guard. For hiss Majesty King Elmer 2nd of that name, says thus: "he may be a Prince but who else can I trust to protect my youngest daughter. I trust him most for he is my grandson and Victoria his aunt. """ His majesty also states thus: most of my knights lack something, yet there are many who don't lack something. But I need those knights, yet I find them slightly trust worthy to protect VictraVoyal, But when my mind falls on Derenle Argren it is given comfort. For I know him well, he will go as far as to protect her with his life" """""
Signed Elmer Voyal, Elmer the 2nd.
The man who wrote this document was a knight and the kings royal scribe. His name was Nathine. He also wrote a journal and stated thus: I was partly scared when I wrote the document to Derenle for I feared the kings anger at the time. He passed back and forth telling me what to write, and yelled at me for making a couple errors. His majesty never acts that way he only did on this occasion due to only that morning two men tried to kidnap Victra the princess. He even yelled at his own son for interrupting him. He also yelled at the gate Lord (the man in charge of the archers at the palace and city gates) for letting such men in. I could hardly believe this for he has such good relationship with him. But he apologised to us all later on.
Thank you for providing the additional information about the origin of the document and the context surrounding its creation. It helps to further understand the circumstances surrounding the assignment of Derenle Argren as Princess Victra Voyal's bodyguard.
According to Nathine's journal, he was partly scared while writing the document to Derenle because he feared the king's anger at the time. This fear likely arose due to a recent incident where two men attempted to kidnap Princess Victra. The king, in his frustration and concern for his daughter's safety, was reportedly agitated during the drafting of the document, and he even berated Nathine for making a couple of errors.
It is interesting to note that the king's behavior during this time was uncharacteristic, as he typically did not act in such an intense manner. He even yelled at his own son and the gate Lord responsible for the security breach. However, the king later apologized to everyone involved, likely realizing that his outburst was fueled by the alarming incident with the attempted kidnapping.
The combination of the document and Nathine's journal provides a deeper understanding of the circumstances that led to Derenle being assigned as Princess Victra's bodyguard. It emphasizes the king's trust in Derenle, stemming from his familial connection as the king's grandson and Victoria's nephew, and the comfort the king finds in knowing Derenle would go to great lengths to protect the princess, even risking his own life.