Use the speech by President Ronald Reagan to answer the question.

We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: "Ich hab noch einen koffer in Berlin." [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]

To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.] Behind me stands a wall that encircles the free sectors of this city, part of a vast system of barriers that divides the entire continent of Europe. From the Baltic, south, those barriers cut across Germany in a gash of barbed wire, concrete, dog runs, and guardtowers.

Every man is a Berliner, forced to look upon a scar. President von Weizsacker has said: "The German question is open as long as the Brandenburg Gate is closed." Today I say: As long as this gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind.

"Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos." Where four decades ago there was rubble, today in West Berlin there is the greatest industrial output of any city in Germany-busy office blocks, fine homes and apartments, proud avenues, and the spreading lawns of park land.

In the 1950's, Khrushchev predicted: "We will bury you." But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind-too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor. Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state?

Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!


In this speech, President Reagan uses a false dichotomy to support his conclusion that “Freedom leads to prosperity.” In 3–5 sentences, describe the false dichotomy and evaluate its effectiveness in supporting his argument.

The false dichotomy in President Reagan's speech is the contrast he draws between the "free world" and the "Communist world." He describes the free world as prosperous and technologically advanced, while depicting the Communist world as failing, technologically backward, and suffering from poverty and hunger. By presenting these two extremes, Reagan suggests that freedom and prosperity are inherently linked, and that communism inevitably leads to poverty and despair. However, this false dichotomy oversimplifies the complex factors that contribute to a country's success or failure, and ignores the nuances and diverse experiences within both "worlds." Therefore, while it may be effective in appealing to emotions and bolstering his argument, it lacks intellectual rigor and fails to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complexities at play.