Students will eat all of their lunches instead of throwing them away.

Lunches would cost more money.
Students learn better when they aren't hungry.
If more people bought lunches, more people would need to be hired.
Students will want to come to school for the good lunches.
Students only want junk food.

Which of these arguments do you think would be the most effective if you were arguing for better school lunches?

The argument that students learn better when they aren't hungry would be the most effective if you were arguing for better school lunches.