My neighbor Mr. Tagore says metal fences are more effective than wooden fencesat keeping dogs from getting out. It must be true that metal fences are superior.What is the weakness in this argument?Not every dog will attempt to get out from someone's yard.There is no reason to think Mr. Tagore is a fence expert.Metal fences may not last quite as long as wooden fences.

Question

My neighbor Mr. Tagore says metal fences are more effective than wooden fencesat keeping dogs from getting out. It must be true that metal fences are superior.What is the weakness in this argument?Not every dog will attempt to get out from someone's yard.There is no reason to think Mr. Tagore is a fence expert.Metal fences may not last quite as long as wooden fences.

Answer 1

The weakness in this argument is based on several factors.

Firstly, the argument assumes that all dogs will attempt to get out from someone's yard. However, this is not necessarily true as not every dog has the same behavior or tendency to escape. Some dogs may be perfectly content staying within their yard regardless of the type of fence.

Secondly, the argument relies on the opinion of Mr. Tagore, the neighbor, without providing any evidence or expertise to support his claim. There is no reason to assume that Mr. Tagore is a fence expert or has any relevant knowledge on the topic.

Lastly, the argument overlooks the fact that metal fences may not last as long as wooden fences. Wooden fences are generally known for their durability and longevity, while metal fences may be prone to rust and deterioration over time. This weakness suggests that the superiority of metal fences may be undermined by their shorter lifespan compared to wooden fences.