What is one characteristic of this student’s work?
Responses
creation of 3-D art
creation of 3-D art - not selected, this is the correct answer
creation of Cubist art
creation of Cubist art - no response given
exact representation of human proportion
exact representation of human proportion - incorrect
use of cool colors only
use of cool colors only - incorrect
Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can significantly enhance its persuasiveness. By presenting a counterargument and providing evidence to refute it, the author demonstrates thoroughness and acknowledges the opposing viewpoint, thereby establishing credibility and trust with the reader. This strategy allows the audience to understand that the argument has been carefully considered and is not just a one-sided perspective. When readers encounter a conflicting point of view along with substantial evidence, it prompts them to engage more critically with the subject matter. It challenges preconceived notions and forces readers to evaluate multiple perspectives before forming their own opinion. For instance, if an essay is arguing in favor of stricter gun control laws, incorporating the opposing viewpoint that argues for the right to bear arms and then presenting evidence to debunk the argument not only demonstrates the author's willingness to engage with differing ideas but also encourages readers to think deeply about the issue and consider alternative perspectives. By incorporating conflicting views and evidence, the overall argument becomes more robust and convincing, fostering a more attentive and thoughtful readership.
must be 200 words and in my own words please
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can greatly enhance its persuasive power. When an author acknowledges and addresses the opposition's perspective, it establishes credibility and fosters trust with the reader. By presenting a counterargument alongside strong evidence to refute it, the author demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic and an ability to engage with different viewpoints.
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence prompts readers to think critically and evaluate the topic from multiple angles. It challenges their preconceived notions and encourages them to consider alternative perspectives before forming an opinion. This approach leads to a more engaged and thoughtful readership.
For example, in a persuasive essay advocating for stricter gun control laws, incorporating the opposing viewpoint that supports the right to bear arms demonstrates the author's willingness to address differing ideas. However, by presenting compelling evidence that highlights the negative consequences of loose gun regulations, such as increased rates of gun violence, the author successfully refutes the opposing argument. This forces readers to reconsider their stance and encourages a deeper analysis of the issue.
Incorporating conflicting views and evidence strengthens the overall argument by demonstrating a comprehensive evaluation of the topic. It shows that the author is not merely cherry-picking evidence to support their own claims but is engaging with the topic in a fair and balanced manner.
In conclusion, including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument makes it more persuasive by establishing credibility, encouraging critical thinking, and fostering a more attentive readership. By acknowledging and addressing opposing perspectives, authors can strengthen their case and effectively persuade readers to consider their viewpoint.
in different words please
The inclusion of a conflicting point of view and supporting evidence in an argument can greatly increase its persuasive impact. By acknowledging and addressing opposing perspectives, the author establishes credibility and demonstrates a willingness to engage with differing opinions. This approach encourages readers to think critically and consider various viewpoints before forming their own conclusions.
When readers encounter a conflicting point of view, it prompts them to analyze the topic more deeply and evaluate the presented arguments more thoughtfully. By challenging their existing beliefs and introducing alternative perspectives, readers are compelled to reevaluate their own stance. This leads to a more engaged and open-minded readership.
For instance, in an essay advocating for stricter gun control laws, incorporating the perspective of those who support the right to bear arms demonstrates a fair and balanced approach. By presenting solid evidence that highlights the negative consequences of lenient gun regulations, such as increased rates of gun violence, the author effectively undermines the opposing argument. This forces readers to consider the potential limitations of their own viewpoint and promotes a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.
By incorporating opposing views and evidence, authors strengthen their arguments by demonstrating a thorough examination of the topic. This shows readers that the author has considered multiple perspectives and provides a more well-rounded and persuasive argument.
In conclusion, the inclusion of a conflicting point of view and evidence enhances the persuasiveness of an argument by establishing credibility, encouraging critical thinking, and cultivating a more engaged readership. By acknowledging opposing perspectives, authors can effectively sway readers to consider their viewpoint in a more thoughtful and comprehensive manner.