which writer, Marlowe or Raleigh, has a more realistic view of country living? Write a short essay in which you compare the views of the two writers through their poetry using at least two examples from the text (one example from each author) with explanation to support your ideas.
In the realm of Renaissance literature, Christopher Marlowe and Sir Walter Raleigh stand as two influential writers who have left behind a rich legacy of poetry. Within their writings, Marlowe and Raleigh both explore the concept of country living, offering distinct perspectives on this way of life. However, when it comes to depicting country living in a more realistic manner, it is evident that Marlowe takes the lead. This can be seen through a comparative analysis of Marlowe's poem "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" and Raleigh's "The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd."
Marlowe's "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" presents an idyllic portrayal of country living, painting a picturesque image of natural beauty and an idealized lifestyle. The poem describes an alluring landscape filled with enchanting elements such as "beds of roses" and "melodious birds." The shepherd promises his love a range of delightful experiences, including gathering "honey-bags" and making garlands of "newly sprouted flowers." This romanticized representation of country living reflects Marlowe's inclination towards escapism and his tendency to idealize the rural environment.
On the other hand, Raleigh's "The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd" provides a contrasting viewpoint that sways towards a more realistic perspective on country living. Raleigh's poem serves as a direct response to Marlowe's work, challenging the idealized portrayal presented in "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love." The nymph's reply is filled with skepticism, acknowledging the transitory nature of the shepherd's promises. She rejects the shepherd's advances, warning that the natural elements he mentions will ultimately fade away, and the beauty of the countryside will cease to exist. Raleigh's poem criticizes the notion that country living is eternally blissful and underlines the impermanence of such idyllic visions.
Examining these two poems, it becomes clear that Marlowe's perspective on country living leans more towards an unrealistic idealism. His depiction of the natural world captures an almost dreamlike atmosphere, one that fails to acknowledge the inevitable challenges and shortcomings of rural life. In contrast, Raleigh's reply displays a shrewdness grounded in reality. Her rejection highlights the temporality of the natural world and the limitations of its offerings. This nuanced approach offers readers a more accurate understanding of the complexities and realities of country living.
In conclusion, when it comes to presenting a more realistic view of country living, Christopher Marlowe falls short in comparison to Sir Walter Raleigh. Marlowe's romanticized portrayal in "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" demonstrates his inclination towards idealism and escapism. On the other hand, Raleigh's poem, "The Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd," challenges Marlowe's idyllic vision, emphasizing the transitory nature of life in the countryside. Raleigh's skepticism provides readers with a more accurate understanding of the ups and downs of country living, making her perspectives on the subject more realistic.