Recall what you have learned in this Portfolio to write an analysis of the texts
"Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" by Yonathan Zohar and "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon" by Rick Moonen. Use the prompts to guide your
response.
a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic.
Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
2. Write a paragraph in which you explain why it
matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader.
3. Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can haye on readers. Give specific examples.
Experienced readers can use several steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they can identify the main arguments and claims presented by each author. This involves understanding the central message and purpose of each text. Second, readers can evaluate the credibility of the sources cited by the authors. This includes considering the expertise, reputation, and bias of the individuals or organizations referenced. Third, readers can compare and contrast the evidence and reasoning provided by each author. This involves closely examining the data, examples, and logical explanations presented. Finally, readers can consider their own knowledge, beliefs, and values to assess which arguments align with their own perspectives and which are more convincing based on the evidence provided.
It is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information because it allows them to make informed decisions and form an unbiased opinion on the topic. In the case of the texts "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" and "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon," recognizing the conflicting information helps readers understand the complex and debated nature of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). For example, Zohar argues that genetically modified salmon can solve world hunger by providing a more efficient and sustainable food source. On the other hand, Moonen highlights concerns about the environmental and health risks associated with GMOs. By recognizing and evaluating these conflicting viewpoints, readers can better understand the potential benefits and risks of genetically modified salmon and make informed decisions about their stance on the issue.
When two authors interpret the same facts differently, it matters because it influences the readers' understanding and perception of the topic. In the case of "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" and "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon," the differing interpretations of the facts impact the readers' perception of the risks and benefits of genetically modified salmon. For example, Zohar emphasizes the potential to alleviate world hunger, while Moonen is focused on the potential risks to the environment and human health. As a reader, these interpretations can provoke different emotional responses and sway one's opinion. If a reader is more concerned about food security and believes in the potential of technology to solve global challenges, they may find Zohar's arguments more persuasive. Conversely, if a reader prioritizes environmental sustainability and has concerns about the long-term effects of GMOs on ecosystems and human health, they may find Moonen's arguments more convincing.
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive by demonstrating a thorough consideration of multiple perspectives and engaging with counterarguments. This shows that the author has taken the time to research and understand different viewpoints, which lends credibility to their own argument. By acknowledging and addressing alternative viewpoints, an author can anticipate and refute potential objections, making their argument more robust. In the case of the two texts, "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" and "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon," including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have a powerful effect on readers. For example, if Zohar were to address Moonen's concerns about environmental impact and health risks associated with GMOs, readers who initially supported Zohar's perspective may be more inclined to consider the opposing viewpoint. This inclusion of conflicting evidence and point of view demonstrates a balanced and comprehensive approach, appealing to readers who value well-rounded arguments and critical thinking.