writing an argument answers

1. What is the topic of your argument?

The topic of my argument is the importance of implementing renewable energy sources to combat climate change.

2. What is your claim or thesis statement?

My claim is that it is imperative for governments and societies to prioritize and invest in renewable energy sources in order to mitigate the effects of climate change.

3. What evidence do you have to support your claim?

I have several pieces of evidence to support my claim. Firstly, multiple scientific studies have shown that greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels are the leading cause of climate change. By transitioning to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, we can significantly reduce these emissions and slow down the rate of climate change.

Secondly, the decreasing cost of renewable energy technologies makes them a viable and economically attractive option. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, the cost of solar and wind power has dropped by almost 90% in the past decade. This means that investing in renewable energy sources is not only environmentally beneficial but also financially advantageous in the long run.

Furthermore, countries that have made significant investments in renewable energy have seen positive results. For example, Germany has been able to generate up to 40% of its electricity from renewable sources, leading to a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and an increase in job opportunities in the renewable energy sector.

4. What opposing viewpoints or counterarguments can you anticipate?

Some opposing viewpoints or counterarguments against investing in renewable energy sources may include the upfront costs of implementing and maintaining such technologies. Critics may argue that the initial investment required for renewable energy infrastructure is too high and that it would take too long to see a return on investment.

Additionally, opponents may claim that renewable energy sources are unreliable and cannot provide a consistent supply of energy. They may argue that during periods of low renewable energy production, reliance on fossil fuels would be necessary, leading to a minimal reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

5. How will you address these opposing viewpoints or counterarguments?

To address the opposing viewpoint regarding upfront costs, I would emphasize the long-term benefits and potential cost savings of investing in renewable energy. While the initial investment may be high, the cost of renewable energy technologies is steadily decreasing, making them more affordable in the long run. Moreover, governments can offer subsidies and incentives to facilitate the transition to renewable energy, reducing the financial burden on individuals and businesses.

Regarding concerns over reliability, I would highlight the advancements in energy storage technologies that allow for the storage of excess energy generated by renewable sources during times of high production. This stored energy can then be used during periods of low production, ensuring a reliable and consistent energy supply.

By addressing these opposing viewpoints with factual evidence and logical reasoning, I can strengthen my argument for the importance of implementing renewable energy sources to combat climate change.