Sir, I was in favor of the annexation of Texas, The democracy of the North, almost to a man, went for annexation. Yes, sir, here was an Empire, larger than France given up to slavery. Should the North make further concessions? Shall we give up free territory, the inheritance of free labor? Sir, the South has her share already: the installation for slavery was paid in advance….Now Sir, we are told that California is ours, that New Mexico is ours, won by the valor of our arms. They are free. Shall they remain free? Shall these fair provinces be the inheritance and homes of the white labor or freemen or the black labor of slaves? This, sir is the issue – this is the question. The North has the right and her representatives have the power. But the South contends that, in their emigration to this free territory, they have the right to take and hold slaves, the same as other property….Slavery follows in the rear of our armies. Shall the war power of our government be exerted to produce such as result? Shall our government depart from its neutrality on this question, and lend its power and influence to plant slavery in these territories?
[Summarize the document
Answer how the article relates to the Prompt (Evaluate the effects of western expansion on both the development of the United States and on the debates over westward expansion from 1820 to 1860. )
Answer why the document was written
Make all three of these points in 3 short paragraphs that are a sentence each.]
everything in brackets is the SPY formatting.
The document argues in favor of the North annexing Texas and expresses concern about the expansion of slavery into new territories, such as California and New Mexico. It highlights the debate surrounding westward expansion and the impact it had on the development of the United States. The author questions whether the government should support the spread of slavery or protect the inheritance of free labor.
This article relates to the prompt by discussing the effects of western expansion on the development of the United States and the debates that arose during this period. It explores the issue of whether new territories should be free or allow the institution of slavery to expand. The document highlights the division between the North and the South on this issue and the potential consequences for the country's future.
The document was likely written to express the author's viewpoint on the annexation of Texas and the expansion of slavery into new territories. It argues against the spread of slavery, advocating for the inheritance of free labor and the preservation of free territories. The author aims to influence public opinion and sway the government towards a position that opposes the further expansion of slavery.
make the sentences shorter
The document supports the annexation of Texas and expresses concerns about the expansion of slavery into new territories. It relates to the prompt by discussing the effects of westward expansion and the debates it sparked. The author questions whether the government should support the spread of slavery or protect free labor. The document was written to convey the author's viewpoint on these issues and influence public opinion.
keep it in paragraphs though
The document argues in favor of the North annexing Texas and expresses concern about the expansion of slavery into new territories. It highlights the debate surrounding westward expansion and the impact it had on the development of the United States. The author questions whether the government should support the spread of slavery or protect the inheritance of free labor.
This article relates to the prompt by discussing the effects of western expansion on the development of the United States and the debates that arose during this period. It explores the issue of whether new territories should be free or allow the institution of slavery to expand. The document highlights the division between the North and the South on this issue and the potential consequences for the country's future.
The document was likely written to express the author's viewpoint on the annexation of Texas and the expansion of slavery into new territories. It argues against the spread of slavery, advocating for the inheritance of free labor and the preservation of free territories. The author aims to influence public opinion and sway the government towards a position that opposes the further expansion of slavery.
shorten those paragraphs
The document supports the annexation of Texas and expresses concern about the expansion of slavery. It relates to the prompt by discussing the impact of western expansion and the debates it caused. The author questions whether the government should support slavery's spread or protect free labor.
This article discusses the effects of western expansion on the United States' development and the debates it generated. It explores whether new territories should be free or allow slavery to expand. The document highlights the North-South divide on this issue and potential consequences for the nation.
The document was likely written to convey the author's views on Texas annexation and expansion of slavery. It argues against slavery's spread, advocating for free labor and preserving free territories. The author aims to influence public opinion and sway the government against further slavery expansion.
Use the "SPY" formatting to answer this source
"It cannot be doubted that this is a war of conquest…It is a war for the extension of slavery over a territory which has already been purged, by Mexican authority, from this stain and curse. Fresh markets of human beings are to be established; further opportunities for this hateful traffic are to be opened; the lash of the overseer is to be quickened in new regions…a government professing the law of charity and justice, should be employed in a war to extend an institution which exists in defiance of these sacred principles. It has already been shown that the annexation of Texas was consummated for this purpose. The Mexican War is a countenance, a prolongation of the same efforts."
S: The source argues that the ongoing war is a war of conquest and aims to extend slavery. It highlights the intention to establish new markets for the slave trade and expand the institution of slavery into territories previously free from it. The author criticizes a government that professes charity and justice for engaging in a war to promote an institution that goes against these principles. The source connects the Mexican War to the earlier annexation of Texas, asserting that it is a continuation of the same efforts.
P: The document relates to the prompt by evaluating the effects of western expansion on both the development of the United States and the debates over westward expansion from 1820 to 1860. It sheds light on the motives behind the Mexican War and raises concerns about the extension of slavery into newly acquired territories. The source adds to the ongoing debates about the expansion of slavery and the ethical implications it poses for a government that claims to uphold justice and charity.
Y: The document was likely written to criticize the government's involvement in the Mexican War and its effort to extend slavery into new territories. The author aims to expose the true motives behind the war, arguing against the expansion of slavery and calling into question the government's adherence to moral principles. The source provides a perspective that challenges the prevailing narrative and attempts to influence public opinion in opposition to the expansion of slavery through conquest.