(a) Distinguish Identify the facts the author uses for his arguments. (b) Defend Split your group into two halves. Each half should use the applicable facts to defend or criticize the statement “It would be worse for the Sherpa way of life to shut down Everest tourism than to continue as things are now.” Present your position to the other
group. Rather than debating, discuss whether the facts can be used to defend your position.
(a) The author uses several facts for his arguments:
1. The Sherpa people heavily rely on tourism as their main source of income.
2. Everest tourism provides job opportunities for the Sherpas.
3. Tourism has brought economic development and improved living standards in the region.
4. Closure of Everest tourism would lead to unemployment and poverty for the Sherpas.
5. Increased regulation and monitoring have improved safety and reduced accidents on Everest.
(b) Group 1 (Defending statement):
Based on the facts presented by the author, we believe it would be worse for the Sherpa way of life to shut down Everest tourism than to continue as things are now. The Sherpas heavily rely on tourism for their livelihood, and it has brought economic development to the region, improving their living standards. Closure of tourism would lead to job losses, unemployment, and poverty among the Sherpas. Furthermore, increased regulation and monitoring have made Everest safer for climbers, reducing accidents and fatalities. These facts indicate that Everest tourism serves as a crucial source of income and stability for the Sherpa community.
Group 2 (Criticizing statement):
After considering the facts provided by the author, we dispute the statement that it would be worse for the Sherpa way of life to shut down Everest tourism than to continue as things are now. While tourism does provide job opportunities, it also creates dependency among the Sherpas on an uncertain industry. The heavy influx of tourists has put immense pressure on the environment, leading to pollution and damage to the natural resources. Additionally, increased regulation and monitoring might reduce accidents, but they cannot eliminate the inherent risks associated with climbing Everest. Moreover, relying solely on tourism as their main source of income hinders the Sherpas from developing alternative sustainable livelihoods. These facts suggest that shutting down Everest tourism would allow the Sherpas to seek more diverse and resilient economic opportunities while preserving their fragile environment.