How does the Supreme Court participate in matters of foreign policy with the legislative and executive branches?(1 point)
Responses
by determining whether the president is able to take military action against other nations
by determining whether the president is able to take military action against other nations
by performing judicial review in cases involving constitutional law between branches and other nations
by performing judicial review in cases involving constitutional law between branches and other nations
by approving the Senate’s majority vote for treaties and diplomatic appointments
by approving the Senate’s majority vote for treaties and diplomatic appointments
by overseeing the appropriation of funds that is decided on by Congress
by overseeing the appropriation of funds that is decided on by Congress
All of the above responses are correct. The Supreme Court participates in matters of foreign policy with the legislative and executive branches through various means.
First, the Supreme Court can determine whether the president is able to take military action against other nations. This falls under the court's power of judicial review, where it can review executive actions and determine their constitutionality.
Second, the Supreme Court performs judicial review in cases involving constitutional law between branches and other nations. This means that if a dispute arises between the legislative or executive branches regarding foreign policy, the Supreme Court can review the case and make a ruling.
Third, the Supreme Court plays a role in approving the Senate's majority vote for treaties and diplomatic appointments. Treaties are agreements made with foreign nations and require Senate approval. The Supreme Court can review the constitutionality of treaties if a dispute arises.
Lastly, the Supreme Court does not directly oversee the appropriation of funds decided on by Congress. This responsibility falls more within the domain of the legislative branch. The Supreme Court's role in matters of foreign policy is primarily focused on interpreting the constitutionality of actions taken by the executive and legislative branches.