which of the following statements accurately explains why the creation of the Texas constitution of 1876 was political turning point in Texas history
1) The creation of the Texas constitution of 1876 marked a shift towards a more limited government and a stronger emphasis on the rights of individual citizens. The constitution was meant to rectify what many perceived as an overly powerful and corrupt state government under the previous constitution of 1869. This change in the constitution represented a turning point in Texas politics and established a new era of governance that shaped the state's future development.
2) The Texas constitution of 1876 was a direct response to the Reconstruction era and the influence of the federal government over the state. Texans were determined to reassert their autonomy and assert their rights as a sovereign state. This political stance and the creation of a new constitution reflected a significant turning point in Texas history, as it demonstrated a rejection of centralized power and a commitment to local control.
3) The creation of the Texas constitution of 1876 was a turning point in Texas history because it solidified the dominance of the Democratic Party in the state and initiated a long period of single-party rule. This constitution included measures such as poll taxes and literacy tests, which disproportionately targeted African Americans and other minority groups, effectively disenfranchising them. This political manipulation ensured the Democratic Party's stronghold on power, further entrenching racial and political divisions within the state.
4) The Texas Constitution of 1876 was a turning point in Texas history as it enshrined a strict agrarian vision and limited the role of government intervention in the economy. This constitution reflected the interests of the predominantly rural population and emphasized a form of economic and political populism. The constitution's provisions, such as restrictions on state debt and limitations on taxation, contributed to an environment conducive to the growth of the agricultural sector, while undermining the potential for industrialization and diversification of the state's economy. This stance had long-lasting effects on the state's economy and political landscape.