You are reading an article from the 1900’s about Shakespear’s work. How relevant is this source?
As an AI language model, I can't directly access external articles or browse the internet. However, I can provide you with some general information to help you evaluate the relevance of a source from the 1900s when discussing Shakespeare's work.
When assessing the relevance of a source, it is important to consider its proximity to the time period in which the subject of study occurred. If you are reading an article from the 1900s about Shakespeare's work, it could potentially be relevant as it falls within a reasonable timeframe after his plays were written and performed.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that Shakespeare's works have been extensively studied and analyzed since his time. Newer research, discoveries, and interpretations have emerged over the years, potentially making more recent sources more relevant and reflective of the current scholarly discussion on Shakespeare.
To determine the relevance of the source, it is important to evaluate its credibility, authorship, and the context in which it was written. Assessing the author's credentials, their expertise on Shakespeare, the purpose of the article, and the possibility of bias are all important factors in determining the source's relevance.
It is generally advisable to consult a variety of sources from different periods to compare and contrast the information and viewpoints presented. This helps to form a comprehensive understanding of Shakespeare's work and the ongoing scholarly discourse around it.