How did the Northern strategy compare to the Southern strategy in the battle of Fort Sumter? While the South bombarded the fort, the North was poorly supplied and chose to surrender and evacuate. In response to secession, the North bombarded the fort, causing the unprepared South to face loss. The South surrounded the fort to prevent delivery of supplies, but the North hired smugglers to bring more. The North attempted to take control of the fort through force, but were stopped by superior Southern forces.
The statements provided do not accurately describe the Northern and Southern strategies in the Battle of Fort Sumter. Here's the correct comparison:
The Northern strategy in the Battle of Fort Sumter was primarily focused on resupplying and holding the fort. As the Confederacy developed, seceding from the Union, they demanded that all federal forts and properties within their territory be handed over to them. Fort Sumter, located in South Carolina, was one such federal fort.
The South, on the other hand, employed a strategy of blockade and siege to eventually force the surrender of Fort Sumter. After secession, the Confederacy demanded the fort's surrender, leading to a standoff. When the fort's supplies began running low, President Abraham Lincoln decided to send provisions to the fort to resupply it.
However, the Southern forces, led by General P.G.T. Beauregard, decided to bombard the fort before the supplies arrived. The Confederate forces bombarded Fort Sumter for two days, causing significant damage. The poorly supplied Northern troops, under the command of Major Robert Anderson, were eventually forced to surrender and evacuate the fort.
Therefore, in summary, the Southern strategy in the Battle of Fort Sumter involved bombarding and laying siege to the fort to force surrender, while the Northern strategy focused on resupplying and defending the fort.