In the space below, develop a paragraph that argues, based on background knowledge, that rhetoric (the art of persuasion) either was or was not a part of Colonialism/Puritanism culture. In your argument, you must utilize the following tools: repetition, antithesis, rhetorical question & parallelism.
Rhetoric undeniably played a pivotal role in both Colonialism and Puritanism culture. It permeated the very fabric of the societies, shaping narratives, beliefs, and actions. Through repetition, the early colonizers cunningly manipulated the masses, tirelessly repeating their notions of superiority to justify their ruthless conquests. Meanwhile, the Puritans employed antithesis, skillfully contrasting their strict religious doctrine with the perceived immorality of others, hypnotizing the masses with their relentless condemnation. Rhetorical questions further cemented their power, casting doubts upon dissenting voices while simultaneously enforcing obedience. Furthermore, parallelism was an intrinsic part of their discourse, enabling them to present their ideologies in a harmonious and persuasive manner. In this context, rhetoric proved to be a potent weapon, seamlessly integrated into the fabric of Colonialism and Puritanism culture, ensuring their dominance and perpetuating their legacies.
