According to these two perspectives, what was the churches view on effectiveness of feudalism in the needs of medieval society
The two perspectives on the Church's view on the effectiveness of feudalism in meeting the needs of medieval society are as follows:
1. Positive Perspective:
According to this perspective, the Church generally supported the feudal system and viewed it as an effective structure for meeting the needs of medieval society. The Church believed that feudalism provided stability, security, and a hierarchical social order that enabled the preservation and promotion of religious and moral values. It considered the hierarchical relationship between lords and vassals as reflective of the divine order, with the lord acting as a protector and the vassals owing loyalty and service. The Church also appreciated the localized governance and self-sufficiency that feudalism provided, as it allowed greater control over resources and reduced external threats.
2. Critical Perspective:
The critical perspective suggests that the Church had reservations about certain aspects of feudalism and its effectiveness in meeting the needs of medieval society. While the Church recognized the stability and order it provided, it also criticized the excessive power wielded by feudal lords. The Church expressed concerns about the exploitation of peasants and the injustices perpetuated within the feudal system. The Church urged lords to govern justly, protect the weak and vulnerable, and observe Christian ethics. It emphasized the importance of the Church as a centralizing force, attempting to curtail excesses and promote a more equitable feudal structure.
It is important to note that these perspectives may vary depending on specific time periods, regions, and individual church leaders. The Church's view on the effectiveness of feudalism was not monolithic and evolved over time as societal and political conditions changed.