Assume that sometime in the future, the IAU clarifies their definition to say that a planet cannot have another object larger than 100km across within its path. If numerous objects bigger than this size are within Pluto's path, how would Scientist 2 most likely react?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AHe would change his position to accept Pluto as a dwarf planet because this would scientifically prove that Pluto is not a planet%0D%0AHe would change his position to accept Pluto as a dwarf planet because this would scientifically prove that Pluto is not a planet%0D%0A%0D%0AHe would argue that the definition still does not accurately categorize celestial objects because their geologic features are more important than the size of objects in their path.%0D%0AHe would argue that the definition still does not accurately categorize celestial objects because their geologic features are more important than the size of objects in their path.%0D%0A%0D%0AHe would argue that the allowable size should be made bigger so that all round objects could be classified as planets.%0D%0AHe would argue that the allowable size should be made bigger so that all round objects could be classified as planets.%0D%0A%0D%0AHe would change his position to accept Pluto as a dwarf planet, because the ambiguity in the definition was the basis for his argument.
He would argue that the definition still does not accurately categorize celestial objects because their geologic features are more important than the size of objects in their path.
