Vicki is writing a report on the benefits of getting children involved in sports. Her thesis is that children who participate in sports are smarter, have superior discipline, and are more confident than children who do not participate. She goes to the library and finds a book entitled The Role of Sports in Childhood Development. Its author, Dr. Frederica Maddelena, is a noted child psychiatrist. The book agrees with only parts of Vicki's thesis. Later, Vicki finds a Web site called sportsexpert She cannot track down the author, but the site was updated that morning. It advocates getting children involved in sports to increase their intelligence, as well as to improve their discipline and confidence.

What is one way for Vicki to decide which source is more credible?

*
The site was updated that morning, so it is more credible.
The book is more credible because its author is a doctor specializing in children.
The book is more credible because its research challenges parts of Vicki's thesis.
the site agrees with Vicki's thesis, so it is more credible.

One way for Vicki to decide which source is more credible is to evaluate the credentials and expertise of the author. In this case, the book's author, Dr. Frederica Maddelena, is a noted child psychiatrist, which suggests that she has specialized knowledge and experience in the field of childhood development. This gives the book more credibility. On the other hand, the website lacks information about the author, making it difficult to assess their expertise and reliability. Therefore, based on the available information, the book seems to be more credible.

pick one

The book is more credible because its author is a doctor specializing in children.