Argument, one federal law, protecting gray wolf should be removed. Many ranches want to allow hunting wolves again. They pointed the increased wolf population in several states numbers that have grown under 1000 to more than 5000 the increases led to more wolf attacks on sheep and cattle argument, two bedroom Laura protecting great wolves should stay in place controversial list say that current Wolf packing and populations are not stable. They point to the fact that wolves near extinction before laws, protect protecting them were enacted, allowing hunting, could eliminate the gains.
The argument claiming that one federal law protecting gray wolves should be removed is based on the desire of many ranchers to allow hunting wolves again. They argue that the wolf population has increased significantly in several states, growing from under 1000 to over 5000. This increase, according to them, has led to a rise in wolf attacks on sheep and cattle.
However, those who believe that the current law protecting gray wolves should stay in place present a controversial list of reasons. They argue that the populations of wolves and their packings are not yet stable. They point out the historical fact that wolves were nearing extinction before laws were enacted to protect them. Allowing hunting again, they fear, could potentially eliminate the gains that have been made in increasing the wolf population.
Overall, the argument boils down to a conflict of interests between ranchers wanting to protect their livestock and those advocating for the preservation and stability of gray wolf populations.