How can discussion be written in research discussion
In order to write a discussion section in a research paper, the following elements and steps can be considered:
1. Restate the research question or objective: Begin the discussion by restating the main research question or objective to provide context for the following analysis.
2. Summarize the main findings: Present a concise summary of the main findings from the study. This can be done by referencing the results section and highlighting the most important outcomes.
3. Interpret the results: Discuss the significance and implications of the findings. Interpret the results in light of the research question or objective and consider any unexpected or contrary results. Explain what the findings suggest and how they contribute to the existing knowledge in the field.
4. Link back to the literature: Connect the findings to the existing literature by discussing how they align with or differ from previous studies. Identify any gaps or limitations in the current understanding of the topic and explain how the current study contributes to addressing those gaps.
5. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses: Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the study design, methodology, and data analysis. Address any limitations or potential biases in the research. This demonstrates a critical evaluation of the study and helps provide a balanced perspective.
6. Discuss alternative explanations: Consider alternative explanations or interpretations of the findings. Discuss any potential confounding factors, limitations, or alternative hypotheses that could explain the results.
7. Address unanswered questions: Identify any unanswered questions or areas for future research. Discuss topics or issues that arose during the study but were not explored in depth, and suggest directions for future research to address these gaps.
8. Conclude the discussion: Provide a concise summary of the main points discussed in the discussion section. Highlight the overall significance of the research and its contribution to the field. Avoid introducing new information in the conclusion.
It is important to maintain a logical flow and coherence throughout the discussion section while providing a well-balanced and evidence-based analysis.