What would an economist expect if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter?
(1 point)
Responses
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because the feelings of excitement are higher.
An economist would expect that students would be less likely to break the rules because the negative incentives for bad behavior have become stricter.
whats the answer?
The answer is:
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
only 1
I apologize for the confusion. The correct answer is:
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
An economist would expect that if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter, students would be less likely to break the rules. There are a couple of reasons for this expectation.
Firstly, stricter negative incentives mean that the expectations are clearer. When rules and punishments are communicated and enforced more strictly, students have a better understanding of what is considered bad behavior and what the consequences will be. This clarity in expectations can lead to a reduction in rule-breaking behavior.
Secondly, stricter negative incentives mean that punishments have become worse. When the potential consequences for breaking the rules become more severe, students may be deterred from engaging in bad behavior. The fear of facing more severe punishments can act as a deterrent and discourage rule-breaking.
On the other hand, an economist would not expect students to be more likely to break the rules just because more rules are available to break. The presence of more rules alone does not necessarily lead to more rule-breaking behavior. It is the combination of clear expectations and stricter punishments that would have a more significant impact on reducing bad behavior.
Lastly, an economist would not expect students to be more likely to break the rules because the feeling of excitement is higher. This assumption does not align with the rational decision-making process that economists typically consider. In general, individuals tend to avoid negative consequences, such as punishments, even if there is a potential for excitement or thrill associated with breaking the rules.
In summary, an economist would expect that if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter, students would be less likely to break the rules because of the clearer expectations and the increased severity of punishments.