How does your finished argument compare to your original outline? What changed as you moved through the writing process? How did those changes improve or refine your writing?
In the original outline, I had a general idea of the main points I wanted to cover in my argument, but as I moved through the writing process, I realized that some points required more explanation or evidence. This led to changes in the structure and content of my argument.
For example, in the outline, I had a brief point stating the importance of renewable energy for environmental sustainability. However, as I delved deeper into the topic, I came across compelling evidence and studies showcasing the detrimental impact of non-renewable energy sources on climate change. This prompted me to expand on the environmental advantages of renewable energy in my finished argument by providing specific examples and statistics, which strengthened my overall point.
I also noticed some logical gaps and inconsistencies in my original outline while writing. Some of my sub-points did not align well with the main thesis, or I realized I needed additional sub-points to support my main arguments. In these cases, I made modifications to ensure coherence and clarity in the flow of ideas.
Moreover, during the writing process, I discovered new research articles, expert opinions, or counterarguments that challenged my initial perspective on the topic. To enhance the quality of my argument, I incorporated these opposing viewpoints and addressed them to provide a more well-rounded and comprehensive analysis.
Overall, these changes helped refine my writing by adding depth, clarity, and credibility to my argument. The inclusion of stronger evidence, addressing counterarguments, and organizing the structure more logically improved the overall persuasive power of my writing. Through these revisions, my argument became more convincing and effective in presenting a well-supported point of view.