Vicki is writing a report on the benefits of getting children involved in sports. Her thesis is that children who participate in sports are smarter, have superior discipline, and are more confident than children who do not participate. She goes to the library and finds a book entitled The Role of Sports in Childhood Development. Its author, Dr. Frederica Maddelena, is a noted child psychiatrist. The book agrees with only parts of Vicki's thesis. Later, Vicki finds a Web site called sports expert . She cannot track down the author, but the site was updated that morning. It advocates getting children involved in sports to increase their intelligence, as well as to improve their discipline and confidence. What is one way for Vicki to decide which source is more credible? * The sports expert site was updated that morning, so it is more credible. The book is more credible because its author is a doctor specializing in children. The book is more credible because its research challenges parts of Vicki's thesis. The sports expert site agrees with Vicki's thesis, so it is more credible.
One way for Vicki to decide which source is more credible is to consider the expertise and credentials of the authors. In this case, the book entitled "The Role of Sports in Childhood Development" is written by Dr. Frederica Maddelena, a noted child psychiatrist. This indicates that the author has specialized knowledge in the field of child development and supports the credibility of the book as a reliable source. On the other hand, the sports expert site does not provide information about the author, making it difficult to assess their credentials or expertise. Therefore, based on the information given, the book is more credible because its author is a doctor specializing in children.
Just the answer plz
The book is more credible because its author is a doctor specializing in children.
To determine which source is more credible, Vicki should consider several factors:
1. Authority and Expertise: Vicki should evaluate the credentials and expertise of the authors or sources. In this case, the book's author, Dr. Frederica Maddelena, is a noted child psychiatrist, which suggests a level of knowledge and expertise in the field. On the other hand, the sports expert site does not provide information about the author, making it difficult to assess their credibility.
2. Relevance and Accuracy: Vicki should assess whether the information provided by each source is relevant to her research topic and whether it aligns with established knowledge and research. While the book agrees with only parts of Vicki's thesis, it indicates that the research challenges some aspects. This suggests a more comprehensive and balanced examination of the topic. The sports expert site, on the other hand, supports Vicki's thesis, which might indicate a potential bias or lack of critical evaluation.
3. Timeliness: While the sports expert site was updated that morning, indicating the information is recent, this alone does not guarantee credibility. Timeliness is an important factor, but it should be considered in conjunction with the expertise and accuracy of the source.
Considering these factors, it would be more reasonable for Vicki to conclude that the book is more credible. It is authored by a noted child psychiatrist and presents research that challenges parts of Vicki's thesis, indicating a comprehensive examination of the topic. However, it is still important for Vicki to critically evaluate both sources, considering other relevant factors such as the currency of research cited in the book and potential biases in the sports expert site.