We see indications that a child's role in perceptual development is passive when we observe? A. irrelevent information made relvant. B. selective attention. C. a preference for certain stimuli. D. systematic search.
There are three of the choices which involve thinking, choosing, and/or acting. Only one involves no action, but merely "let it come to me." Which one, do you think?
Be sure you are clear on the meanings of ALL the words. Look them up here:
http://www.answers.com
Making information relevant is the job of the presenter, while the audience can be involved in the remaining choices.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
To determine which of the options A, B, C, or D suggests that a child's role in perceptual development is passive, we need to understand the nature of each option.
A. Irrelevant information made relevant: This option implies that children are actively involved in making irrelevant information relevant. This suggests an active role rather than a passive one.
B. Selective attention: Selective attention refers to the ability to focus on specific stimuli while ignoring others. While children do actively engage in selective attention, it doesn't necessarily indicate a passive role in perceptual development.
C. A preference for certain stimuli: This option suggests that children have a natural bias or innate preference for certain types of stimuli. It implies that children are more passive recipients rather than active participants in their perceptual development. This option aligns more closely with a passive role.
D. Systematic search: Systematic search refers to actively exploring the environment to find specific information or stimuli. This indicates an active role in perceptual development.
Based on the explanations, option C - a preference for certain stimuli, suggests that a child's role in perceptual development is passive.