Identify why Sweden was relatively more successful than Denmark and Norway based on maps, geographic location, and resources. (1 point)
One possible reason for Sweden's relative success compared to Denmark and Norway could be its more favorable geographic location and resources.
- Maps: Sweden has a larger land area compared to Denmark and Norway. This provides Sweden with more available natural resources, such as timber, minerals, and arable land. Having a larger territory allows Sweden to have a greater potential for economic development and resource exploitation.
- Geographic location: Sweden is located on the eastern side of the Scandinavian Peninsula, which gives it better access to trade routes and markets in the Baltic Sea and Northern Europe. Being closer to these trade routes allows for easier and more profitable trade exchanges, which can contribute to economic growth.
- Resources: Sweden has a diverse range of natural resources that have historically played a significant role in its economic development. For example, Sweden possesses large iron ore deposits, which have been crucial for the production of steel and contributed to its industrial success. Timber resources have also been important for the production of ships and other wood-based industries.
These factors, including a larger land area, advantageous location for trade, and diverse natural resources, may have contributed to Sweden's relatively higher degree of success compared to its neighboring countries of Denmark and Norway. However, it is important to note that other factors such as historical events, political decisions, and cultural dynamics also play a role in a country's overall success, and these should be taken into account for a comprehensive analysis.