Why did Southerners resist the increased tariff in 1828, arguing it should be nullified?
(1 point)
Responses
It was not helpful to any section of the country.
It was not helpful to any section of the country.
It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
It increased the market for cotton.
It increased the market for cotton.
It increased foreign competition.
It increased foreign competition.
The correct response is: It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
Which of the following did Andrew Jackson believe made the federal government “subversive to the rights of the states” and was a monopoly controlled by foreigners and the rich?
(1 point)
Responses
The Bank of the United States
The Bank of the United States
The United States Constitution
The United States Constitution
The Electoral College
The Electoral College
The Indian Removal Act
The correct response is: The Bank of the United States
What is the unanswered question of the Nullification Crisis?
(1 point)
Responses
Does the federal government have absolute power to place tariffs on goods?
Does the federal government have absolute power to place tariffs on goods?
Do the states have the right to nullify other states’ laws?
Do the states have the right to nullify other states’ laws?
Does the federal government or do the states have greater rights and powers?
Does the federal government or do the states have greater rights and powers?
Do the states have the right to secede from the union?
Do the states have the right to secede from the union?
The correct answer is: It benefited one section of the country at the expense of another.
To understand why Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 and argued for its nullification, we need to examine the context of the situation. In this case, the tariff in question was the Tariff of Abominations, which was passed by Congress in 1828. This tariff imposed high taxes on imported goods, particularly on manufactured goods that the South relied on.
The reason Southerners resisted the tariff was because they believed it was unfair and biased against their region. They argued that the tariff benefited the industrial North at the expense of the agricultural South. The South relied heavily on the export of cash crops, such as cotton, to Europe. The increased tariff made it more expensive for Southern planters to purchase manufactured goods from Europe, which in turn reduced the demand for Southern cotton in European markets.
Additionally, Southerners believed that the tariff increased foreign competition. They argued that the high taxes on imported goods made it harder for foreign countries to buy Southern agricultural products, including cotton. This led to a decrease in demand and lower prices for Southern goods.
In response to these concerns, some Southern states, particularly South Carolina, argued for the nullification of the tariff. Nullification was the idea that states had the right to declare federal laws unconstitutional and therefore not enforce them within their borders. This debate over nullification and states' rights ultimately played a role in the lead-up to the American Civil War.
In summary, Southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828, arguing for its nullification because they believed it benefitted the industrial North at the expense of the agricultural South, increased foreign competition, and disrupted the market for Southern agricultural products, particularly cotton.