shorten In my contemporary context, an example of unjust administration of justice can be seen in the case of racial profiling by law enforcement. This occurs when individuals from a certain racial or ethnic background are targeted and subjected to unfair treatment solely based on their appearance. An instance of this could be when a person of color is stopped and searched by the police without any reasonable suspicion or evidence of wrongdoing. The material content would involve the specific incidents and experiences of those who have been unfairly targeted, along with incidents of racial profiling that have been documented or reported in the media.

On the other hand, a contemporary example of fair administration of justice can be observed in the legal proceedings and sentencing for a high-profile criminal case. For instance, if a celebrity is accused and found guilty of a crime, and the judge and jury handle the case with impartiality, adhering to evidence and legal procedures, the administration of justice in this scenario can be considered fair. The material content would involve the details of the criminal case, including evidence presented, legal arguments made, and the final judgment and sentencing.

Fairness, in my understanding, is about treating all individuals equitably, regardless of their race, gender, social status, or any other characteristic. It involves considering the facts, evidence, and circumstances of a situation impartially and making decisions based on principles of justice. In the case of unfair administration of justice, there is a clear violation of fairness as individuals are targeted and treated unjustly solely based on their racial background. On the other hand, the fair administration of justice aligns with the concept of fairness, as decisions are made based on evidence and legal principles, ensuring equal treatment for all parties involved.

In my contemporary context, an example of unjust administration of justice is racial profiling by law enforcement. This occurs when individuals from a certain racial or ethnic background are unfairly targeted and treated solely based on their appearance. For instance, a person of color being stopped and searched by police without reasonable suspicion or evidence of wrongdoing. This is documented and reported in the media, along with the experiences of those who have been targeted.

On the other hand, a contemporary example of fair administration of justice is seen in high-profile criminal cases. If a celebrity is accused, found guilty, and the judge and jury handle the case impartially, adhering to evidence and legal procedures, the administration of justice can be considered fair. This would involve details of the case, including evidence, legal arguments, and the final judgment and sentencing.

Fairness, to me, means treating all individuals equitably, regardless of their race, gender, or social status. It involves impartially considering the facts, evidence, and circumstances and making decisions based on principles of justice. In unjust administration of justice, individuals are targeted and treated unfairly based on their racial background, violating fairness. Conversely, fair administration of justice aligns with fairness, as decisions are made based on evidence and legal principles, ensuring equal treatment for all parties involved.