Which of the following statements best describes the event that became known as the Yazoo land fraud? (1 point)
The governor of Georgia gave away much of Georgia's unsettled land to personal friends,
O Several Georgia legislators were bribed into selling some of the state's western lands for pennies an acre.
The judicial branch of Georgia was given favors in exchange for striking down a law limiting land sales.
O Several large land companies were selling land to Georgia settlers even though the companies did not own the land
Several Georgia legislators were bribed into selling some of the state's western lands for pennies an acre.
Which of these describes the Headright System? (1 point) Responses Free land was given to white heads of households over 21 Free land was given to white heads of households over 21 Free land was given to white men and slaves who fought during the Civil War. Free land was given to white men and slaves who fought during the Civil War. A barter and trade system that was established for anyone with a family or for soldiers who wished to own land. A barter and trade system that was established for anyone with a family or for soldiers who wished to own land. Land was sold to heads of households who could pay a penny per acre
Free land was given to white heads of households over 21.
To determine which of the statements best describes the event known as the Yazoo land fraud, we can examine each option and evaluate their accuracy.
1. The governor of Georgia gave away much of Georgia's unsettled land to personal friends.
Explanation: Under this statement, the governor is directly involved in the fraudulent act of giving away Georgia's land to his personal friends. While corruption and favoritism can be considered fraudulent, it does not specifically represent the Yazoo land fraud.
2. Several Georgia legislators were bribed into selling some of the state's western lands for pennies an acre.
Explanation: This statement suggests that the fraud occurred through the bribery of Georgia legislators, resulting in the sale of state-owned western lands for a significantly lower value. This description accurately characterizes the Yazoo land fraud.
3. The judicial branch of Georgia was given favors in exchange for striking down a law limiting land sales.
Explanation: This option suggests that the judiciary in Georgia was influenced and provided favors in exchange for striking down a law that restricted land sales. Although corruption is implied, this statement does not specifically describe the Yazoo land fraud.
4. Several large land companies were selling land to Georgia settlers even though the companies did not own the land.
Explanation: This option suggests that land companies fraudulently sold land to settlers in Georgia despite not actually owning the land. While this represents fraudulent activity, it does not exclusively represent the Yazoo land fraud.
Based on the analysis above, the second statement, "Several Georgia legislators were bribed into selling some of the state's western lands for pennies an acre," best describes the event known as the Yazoo land fraud.