Must all public highways be 66' wide? Why? Why not? Please refer to the sources for your
answer and explain which public highways you are referring to.
No, not all public highways must be 66' wide. The width of public highways can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific requirements for each particular highway. There is no universally mandated width for all public highways.
The width of a highway is determined by various factors such as traffic volume, expected vehicle types, surrounding land use, design speed, and safety considerations. Different jurisdictions may have different standards and guidelines for determining the appropriate width of their public highways.
For example, in the United States, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides design standards and guidelines for various types of highways. According to the FHWA's "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (also known as the Green Book), the recommended minimum width for rural two-lane highways with narrow shoulders is typically 22 to 24 feet per lane, which equals 44 to 48 feet total width. However, this is a general recommendation and not an absolute requirement.
In urban areas, highways may have wider widths to accommodate higher traffic volumes and additional lanes. The width of urban highways can vary significantly depending on the specific needs and constraints of the area, such as the availability of land, adjacent infrastructure, and planned development.
To summarize, there is no fixed width requirement of 66' for all public highways. The width of public highways depends on various factors and can vary depending on the jurisdiction, type of highway, and specific design considerations.