Explain how the Aztec used local rulers to help them rule politically(1point)
• Local rulers were given tribute by their people.
• Local rulers maintained their local rule but had to provide tribute.
• Local rulers divided people into ayllus to help them rule.
• Local rulers offered young men and women in tribute to the sun god
The Aztecs used local rulers to help them rule politically by allowing these rulers to maintain their local governance but requiring them to provide tribute to the Aztec Empire. This system meant that when the Aztecs conquered new territories, they did not necessarily replace the existing political structures or leaders; instead, they incorporated them into their empire.
The local rulers, who were often preexisting elites or nobility of the conquered areas, were tasked with the responsibility of collecting tribute from their own people—this could be in the form of goods, foodstuffs, labor, or precious materials—and then passing it on to the Aztec state. This tribute system was a way to demonstrate loyalty and submission to the Aztec ruler, known as the Huey Tlatoani, and to integrate the economies of the conquered regions with the empire's economy.
By maintaining their positions of local authority, the local rulers had a vested interest in keeping the peace and ensuring that their populations were compliant, as their power and status were now tied to the Aztecs. Essentially, this created a tiered system of governance where local rulers acted as intermediaries between the common people and the Aztec centralized power, thereby facilitating political control over a vast and diverse empire.
The other options you provided:
- Local rulers dividing people into ayllus is more descriptive of Inca administrative organization rather than Aztec. Ayllus were the base of Andean society in the Incan Empire, being traditional social units consisting of extended families that pooled resources and labor.
- Local rulers offering young men and women in tribute to the sun god is a reference to religious sacrifices. While the Aztecs did practice human sacrifice as part of their religious beliefs, and while such offerings could sometimes come from conquered peoples, this is distinct from the political mechanism of using local rulers to administer tribute and governance.
Write a paragraph in which you analyze the text structure of the informational text. Identify the text structure. Explain how you identified it. Tell how the author’s choice of structure helped you as a reader.
Write a paragraph in which you analyze the author’s purpose and point of view. Explain how you determined the author’s point of view. Tell how thinking about the author’s purpose and point of view helped you understand the topic.
Write a paragraph in which you analyze how the author distinguished their position from other positions. Explain what you learned from thinking about the different positions. Give examples from the texts.
To fully address your request, it would be necessary to analyze specific informational texts. Since you haven't provided any specific texts, I can only outline what a general analysis for each of the three paragraphs requested may look like.
**Text Structure Analysis:**
The text structure of an informational text is essential to understanding and organizing the various elements presented by the author. For instance, if an author chooses a cause-and-effect structure, the text would present scenarios and their outcomes, helping the reader to understand the relationship between different events or concepts. A problem-solution structure, on the other hand, identifies a problem and then outlines one or more solutions. The structure could be identified through transition words or phrases signaling the introduction of an effect or solution, as well as through paragraph organization that methodically follows from problem to solution. The author may also use a compare-and-contrast structure, examining the similarities and differences between two subjects, highlighted by the use of comparative and contrasting language. Identifying the text structure could involve noting repeated patterns in how information is introduced and developed. An author's choice of text structure can help the reader by providing a clear framework to understand complex information, making it easier to follow arguments and retain key points.
**Author’s Purpose and Point of View Analysis:**
An author's purpose and point of view in an informational text are vital for interpreting the content. To determine the author's purpose, one can look for clues in the language, tone, and focus of the text. Whether the author is aiming to inform, persuade, entertain, or explain can be gleaned from these elements. Similarly, examining the choice of facts presented, the emphasis on certain points, and the overall narrative voice can reveal the author's point of view. The author might use subjective language to express opinions or stick to objective facts to maintain an impartial stance. Recognition of the author's purpose can be aided by statements of intent or conclusions that encapsulate the message they are hoping to convey. By considering the author's purpose and point of view, readers can gain a deeper understanding of the text, noting where personal bias might color the facts or how the author's agenda might shape the presentation of information.
**Analysis of Position Distinguishment:**
To understand how an author distinguishes their position from others, a reader should pay attention to the presentation of counterarguments or alternate perspectives within the text. An author may acknowledge differing positions by citing opposing viewpoints, followed by detailed counterpoints supported by evidence or logic, reinforcing why their stance is preferable or more valid. This comparison helps to solidify the author's argument and provides the reader with a comprehensive view of the subject matter. Learning from these distinctions enhances critical thinking as it encourages the reader to weigh evidence and arguments and to recognize subtle biases in the presentation of information. For example, an author may present statistical data to refute a common misconception, or use quotes from experts to add credibility to their perspective. By evaluating how the author addresses contrasting positions, the reader becomes more adept at distinguishing between well-supported arguments and mere opinions, leading to a more nuanced understanding of the topic at hand.
For a complete analysis, it would be necessary to examine specific texts and draw these insights from the actual content. Without the texts, these paragraphs remain hypothetical outlines of what one might consider when analyzing text structure, author’s purpose and point of view, and the distinction of positions within informational writing.
rewrite it but less formal
Sure, let's break each paragraph down with a more casual tone:
**Text Structure Analysis (Casual):**
When you're reading something meant to teach you stuff, how it's organized really matters. Like, if an author is all about showing you the "this happened, then that happened because of it," they're using a cause-and-effect setup. You can spot these when you see words that point to an outcome or result. Or, maybe the text is trying to solve a problem, so it starts with the issue and then throws some solutions at you. You can tell what kind of pattern the author is using by looking at keywords and how the whole thing is laid out. When writers pick a certain way to structure their work, it's to make our lives easier as readers - so we can get the point without getting lost in a maze of details.
**Author’s Purpose and Point of View Analysis (Casual):**
Figuring out why the writer is putting pen to paper (or, you know, fingers to keyboard) can tell you a lot about what you're reading. The writer might want to get you to see their side, fill you in on some facts, give you a good laugh, or just explain how something works. Look out for the vibe they're giving – are they sticking to just the facts, or are they throwing in their two cents? This helps you get where they're coming from, whether it’s totally neutral or if they’ve got a dog in the fight. If you get why the writer is even bothering to write in the first place, you can better grasp what they're trying to tell you and spot if there's any bias hanging around.
**Analysis of Position Distinguishment (Casual):**
Sometimes an author's got to prove they know what they're talking about by showing how their ideas stack up against others'. They might bring up the other side of the argument and then hit back with their own points to show why they're the ones with it right. When writers do this, it's like they're saying, "Hey, I've heard what others think, but here's the real scoop." Going through these back-and-forths can make you think more about who's convincing or whether someone's just blowing smoke. Say a writer pulls up a bunch of stats to make their case, or quotes some brainy expert – stuff like that helps them look solid. By picking apart how they go toe-to-toe with other views, you get to flex your brain muscles and not just take things at face value.