Which strategy is the most effective way for the author of a persuasive text to refute an opposing viewpoint?(1 point)
Responses
restating the original argument in even stronger terms
restating the original argument in even stronger terms
telling readers that the opposing viewpoint simply has no support
telling readers that the opposing viewpoint simply has no support
providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint
providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint
pointing out that the opposing viewpoint is biased
pointing out that the opposing viewpoint is biased
Skip to navigation
Providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint is often considered the most effective strategy for refuting an opposing viewpoint in a persuasive text. This approach is based on the use of concrete, empirical data to challenge the claims of the other side, which tends to be more convincing than merely restating one’s own position, making unsupported dismissals, or attacking the opponent’s bias.
Using relevant and reliable statistical evidence supports the author’s argument by showing that there is factual backing for their position. This not only addresses the opposing argument directly but also strengthens the author's credibility and appeal to the logical reasoning of the audience.
Of course, the effectiveness of this strategy depends on the context and how the information is presented. The statistics need to be interpreted correctly and should come from trustworthy sources. Additionally, the author should be prepared to explain how the statistics directly relate to the argument and address potential counter-arguments the opposing side might have about the data.