Should We Bring Back Extinct Species?%0D%0ASection #1%0D%0A%0D%0AThe idea of bringing extinct species back to life is known as “de-extinction,” and it’s now a legitimate scientific field. By extracting DNA from museum specimens and splicing it into the cells of similar living species, scientists say they can engineer animals back into existence. Researchers have started thinking seriously about which extinct species to focus their efforts on. Near the top of most lists are the woolly mammoth, which lived in the Arctic and went extinct about 4,000 years ago, and the passenger pigeon, which was once the most common bird in North America but went extinct in 1914.%0D%0A%0D%0ABut just because scientists may be able to bring species back doesn’t mean they should. Two scientists debate the ethics of de-extinction.%0D%0A%0D%0A %0D%0A%0D%0A1. Which context clue strategy does the author use for the term "de-extinction"?%0D%0A%0D%0A %0D%0A%0D%0A %0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0Asynonym%0D%0Asynonym%0D%0A%0D%0Aantonym%0D%0Aantonym%0D%0A%0D%0Ainference%0D%0Ainference%0D%0A%0D%0Aexplanation/example%0D%0Aexplanation/example%0D%0AQuestion 2%0D%0A2. What is the central idea of section #1?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AWooly mammoths lived in the Arctic over 40,000 years ago.%0D%0AWooly mammoths lived in the Arctic over 40,000 years ago.%0D%0A%0D%0AScientists are able to engineer extinct animals back into existence.%0D%0AScientists are able to engineer extinct animals back into existence.%0D%0A%0D%0APassenger pigeons went extinct in 1914.%0D%0APassenger pigeons went extinct in 1914.%0D%0A%0D%0AScientists can extract DNA. %0D%0AScientists can extract DNA. %0D%0AQuestion 3%0D%0A3. Examine the author's word choice at the end of section #1. Which position does the author seem to show bias toward? In other words, which position does the author seem to agree with?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AWe should bring back extinct species.%0D%0AWe should bring back extinct species.%0D%0A%0D%0AWe should not bring back extinct species.

Question

Should We Bring Back Extinct Species?%0D%0ASection #1%0D%0A%0D%0AThe idea of bringing extinct species back to life is known as “de-extinction,” and it’s now a legitimate scientific field. By extracting DNA from museum specimens and splicing it into the cells of similar living species, scientists say they can engineer animals back into existence. Researchers have started thinking seriously about which extinct species to focus their efforts on. Near the top of most lists are the woolly mammoth, which lived in the Arctic and went extinct about 4,000 years ago, and the passenger pigeon, which was once the most common bird in North America but went extinct in 1914.%0D%0A%0D%0ABut just because scientists may be able to bring species back doesn’t mean they should. Two scientists debate the ethics of de-extinction.%0D%0A%0D%0A %0D%0A%0D%0A1. Which context clue strategy does the author use for the term "de-extinction"?%0D%0A%0D%0A %0D%0A%0D%0A %0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0Asynonym%0D%0Asynonym%0D%0A%0D%0Aantonym%0D%0Aantonym%0D%0A%0D%0Ainference%0D%0Ainference%0D%0A%0D%0Aexplanation/example%0D%0Aexplanation/example%0D%0AQuestion 2%0D%0A2. What is the central idea of section #1?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AWooly mammoths lived in the Arctic over 40,000 years ago.%0D%0AWooly mammoths lived in the Arctic over 40,000 years ago.%0D%0A%0D%0AScientists are able to engineer extinct animals back into existence.%0D%0AScientists are able to engineer extinct animals back into existence.%0D%0A%0D%0APassenger pigeons went extinct in 1914.%0D%0APassenger pigeons went extinct in 1914.%0D%0A%0D%0AScientists can extract DNA. %0D%0AScientists can extract DNA. %0D%0AQuestion 3%0D%0A3. Examine the author's word choice at the end of section #1. Which position does the author seem to show bias toward? In other words, which position does the author seem to agree with?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AWe should bring back extinct species.%0D%0AWe should bring back extinct species.%0D%0A%0D%0AWe should not bring back extinct species.

Answer 1

1. Explanation/example

The author introduces the term "de-extinction" and then immediately follows up with an explanation of what de-extinction entails. They describe the process of extracting DNA from museum specimens and splicing it into the cells of similar living species, outlining how scientists could potentially engineer animals back into existence. This explanation of the process serves as context to understand what de-extinction means.

2. Scientists are able to engineer extinct animals back into existence.

The central idea in this section is an introduction to the concept of "de-extinction," which is the scientific endeavor to bring extinct species back to life. While mention is made of woolly mammoths and passenger pigeons as potential candidates for de-extinction, these are examples provided to support the central idea about the possibility and scientific interest in engineering extinct animals back into existence.

3. We should not bring back extinct species.

The section ends with the cautionary statement, "But just because scientists may be able to bring species back doesn’t mean they should," which indicates a potential ethical concern or skepticism about the process and outcomes of de-extinction. This wording suggests that the author may have some bias toward the position that there are reasons to be cautious about, or possibly against, pursuing de-extinction.