Discussion section for a lab report for the purifying enzymes lab using egg whites, testing of lysozyme activity at various temperature and pH, the protein concentrations of various fractions, and SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis
Below is a template for a discussion section of a lab report where you are purifying enzymes (specifically lysozyme) from egg whites, testing lysozyme activity under various temperatures and pH levels, and analyzing protein concentrations and profiles via SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. Remember to tailor the discussion to reflect the specific results of your experiment.
---
**Discussion**
Our experiment sought to purify lysozyme from egg whites and assess its activity under different temperature and pH conditions. We also aimed to analyze the protein content of different fractions obtained during purification and assess their purity and molecular weight using SDS-PAGE.
Purification of lysozyme involved precipitation of unwanted proteins with ammonium sulfate, dialysis to remove small molecules, and chromatography techniques. Throughout this process, we obtained fractions with varying levels of protein content. Bradford assays allowed us to quantify protein concentrations in these fractions, where we expected to find the highest concentration of proteins post ammonium sulfate precipitation and subsequent steps to be enriched for lysozyme.
Our results demonstrated a distinctive peak of protein concentration corresponding to the fractions predicted to contain lysozyme. The peak's presence in those fractions suggests that our purification was successful, at least partially, in isolating lysozyme. However, some contaminants may have remained, as evident from the protein concentration in subsequent fractions.
Testing for lysozyme activity revealed a bell-shaped curve across the pH range, with optimal activity around pH 7, aligning with literature that suggests lysozyme is most active in neutral or slightly basic conditions. At pH extremes, denaturation or changes in the enzyme's active site may have led to diminished activity.
Temperature trials showed increased lysozyme activity up to a certain point, beyond which activity decreased sharply. This pattern is characteristic of enzyme kinetics, whereby heat initially accelerates molecular interactions, but excessive heat can denature enzymes. Our results indicated that lysozyme has an optimal temperature range which is consistent with its biological context in avian egg whites, designed to function at ambient temperatures.
SDS-PAGE analysis provided visual confirmation of the purification process. Initially, a high number of bands indicated the presence of various proteins. Post-purification, we expected to see fewer bands, ideally isolating a single band corresponding to lysozyme. The molecular weight of lysozyme was expected to be around 14 kDa. A band of this weight suggested that we indeed purify lysozyme, though the presence of other bands indicated residual impurities.
It is important to note that our experimental results would benefit from additional controls. A standard curve with known concentrations of lysozyme would have offered more accurate quantification. Furthermore, activity assays would have been improved with a known inhibitor or activator of lysozyme as a control to demonstrate the specificity of the measured activity.
In conclusion, the purified lysozyme showed expected behavior with regards to pH and temperature, providing a basis for further experiments on enzyme kinetics and stability. SDS-PAGE confirmed the purification to a degree but also highlighted the necessity for further refinement of the purification protocol to achieve higher purity levels. Future studies could explore alternative chromatographic techniques such as ion exchange or affinity columns that may yield a higher purity of lysozyme. Such improvements to the purification process might result in a clearer understanding of lysozyme's properties and its potential applications in various industries.
***Note:*** This section should be customized and critically adjusted according to your actual results, observations, and any discrepancies or errors you may have encountered. The overall tone of the discussion should reflect an analytical and objective evaluation of the experiment, including both successes and limitations.