How did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen lead to the independence of Haiti?(1 point)
Responses
The enslaved people in the colony of Saint-Dominque started a revolution when the declaration was not adopted by the colonists.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen was written by Haitian leader Toussaint Louverture to inspire the affranchis.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen inspired the American Revolution, and the people of Saint-Domingue followed its example.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen automatically freed the all enslaved people in French territories, making the colony of Saint-Domingue independent.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen did not automatically free all enslaved people in French territories or make the colony of Saint-Domingue independent; however, it played an inspirational role in Haiti's fight for independence. The declaration, adopted during the French Revolution in 1789, set forth principles of freedom, equality, and fraternity, which were supposed to apply to all men.
The enslaved people and free people of color in the French colony of Saint-Domingue (present-day Haiti) were heavily influenced by the egalitarian principles of the declaration. When the white planters in Saint-Domingue refused to give equal rights to free people of color and continued the institution of slavery, tensions escalated. These tensions, combined with the broader impact of the French Revolution, ultimately led to the slave uprising in 1791, spearheaded by figures like Toussaint Louverture, who was not the author of the Declaration but was a central figure in the Haitian Revolution.
Therefore, the correct response is:
The enslaved people in the colony of Saint-Dominque started a revolution when the declaration was not adopted by the colonists.
This revolution eventually led to the independence of Haiti in 1804, making it the first black republic in the world and the first colony in the Western Hemisphere to successfully achieve independence from European colonial rule through a slave revolt.
Which of the following best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades?(1 point)
Responses
Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.
The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
This is largely due to the evolution of human rights concepts and the fact that many newer constitutions and international rights documents have expanded upon the basic rights included in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Over time, international rights frameworks, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and various regional human rights treaties, have set forth a wider range of rights that reflect contemporary concerns, including socio-economic rights, environmental rights, and digital privacy rights, which are not explicitly covered in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Additionally, some national constitutions have included provisions for newer concepts of rights and mechanisms for their protection that might be more suited to present-day challenges and societal values.
what is the correct answer
The correct answer among the options provided is:
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
This answer reflects the idea that as global views on human rights have evolved, newer constitutions and human rights instruments have emerged to encompass a broader range of protections than those originally outlined in the early American constitutional documents. Countries creating or revising their own constitutions might therefore be looking beyond the U.S. model to incorporate these more expansive and contemporary rights and principles.
How did the Agricultural Revolution allow farmers to make money?(1 point)
Responses
Farmers were able to rent out machines to other famers.
Farmers gave up working the farm to make a better living working in factories.
A surplus of food allowed farmers to sell extra crops to cities and towns, and eventually overseas.
Enclosures allowed famers to practice new farming methods and make money off the land.
The correct answer is:
A surplus of food allowed farmers to sell extra crops to cities and towns, and eventually overseas.
One of the significant changes during the Agricultural Revolution was the dramatic increase in crop production, thanks to improvements in farming techniques such as crop rotation, selective breeding of livestock, and the use of machinery. This led to a surplus of food, allowing farmers to sell their excess produce to people who lived in cities and towns. As transportation improved, these goods could also be sold farther afield, including overseas, thereby providing additional income streams for farmers.
Identify the main reason for global migration during the Industrial Revolution.(1 point)
Responses
hopes for a better life
more jobs
colonization
technology
The main reason for global migration during the Industrial Revolution was:
more jobs
The Industrial Revolution brought about a significant need for labor to work in the factories, mines, and railways that were rapidly expanding. Many people migrated from rural areas to urban centers and from one country to another in search of employment opportunities created by this industrial growth. The promise of steady work and, consequently, a more stable income was a major driver of migration during this period.
What was one reason for societal tension during the Industrial Revolution?(1 point)
Responses
Communist factory owners objected to the capitalist nature of the machine production.
Workers made money by selling products created in factories on the black market.
Artisans took jobs away from factory workers because their skills were valued more than efficiency.
Factory owners got very rich while workers remained poor.