This architectural design was created by
(1 point)
O using an organie pattern in the form of a tessellation
© using a geometric pattern in the form a tessellation.
O using no definite pattern and placing shapes randomly,
© using patterns that alternate between geometrie and organie,
The statement seems to be incomplete as it does not specify which architectural design is being referred to. Therefore, it's impossible to accurately determine how the described architectural design was created without additional context.
To address the given options though:
- If the architecture incorporates repetitive patterns based on shapes found in nature, this would be described as "using an organic pattern in the form of a tessellation."
- If the design uses shapes with regular angles and lines, like squares, triangles, or hexagons in a repeatable pattern, it would be "using a geometric pattern in the form of a tessellation."
- If there is no discernible repeatable pattern and shapes are placed without a clear order, it would be "using no definite pattern and placing shapes randomly."
- If the design alternates between natural shapes and regular geometric forms, it could be described as "using patterns that alternate between geometric and organic."
To accurately select an option, one would need specific information about the architectural design in question.